Better living through incrementality: Immediate static analysis feedback without loss of precision
Static analyses are best known for detecting errors at compile time and thus helping developers to write correct code. That’s an honorable quest and not for nothing static analysis is sometimes referred to as lightweight verification. But static analysis has a second quest of equal importance: to aid program understanding. Development tools such as IDEs use information computed by static analyses to explain the program to the developer, to provide exploration functionality, to guide developers, and to provide sophisticated edit actions. IDEs must provide all these features without interrupting the workflow of the developer. In particular, IDEs must react quickly to code changes. That is, the underlying static analyses need to be incremental.
We present IncA, a language-independent framework for incremental static analysis that does not compromise on precision. IncA provides a DSL for the definition of static analyses and incrementalizes them automatically. We explain how the IncA compiler translates analysis specifications into Datalog-style rules and how the IncA runtime solves these rules incrementally. We particularly discuss how IncA incrementalizes fixpoint computations, which are ubiquitous in data-flow analysis. IncA has been used to incrementalize control flow and points-to analysis for C, string analysis and strong points-to analysis for Java, and type analysis for Rust. However, one of our main application areas are DSLs: DSL adoption requires competitive tooling, yet it does not pay off to invest years of engineering to build and maintain incremental analyses.
Tue 6 Nov
|13:30 - 14:30|